While the eye of an ordinary person does not distinguish more than 24 frames per second, the eye of e -sportsman will soon begin to see 360 ​​frames. NVIDIA together with Asus I introduced the world’s first monitor with an update frequency of 360 Herz-ASUS ROG SWIFT 360Hz G-Sync.

The device is aimed at e -sportsmen, has a diagonal 24.5 inches and 1080p resolution, and also works on G-Sync technology.

According to NVIDIA, Earlier, video game athletes abandoned vertical synchronization and suffered the screen breaks, if only more often shots on the monitor were updated. With ROG SWIFT 360HZ, you can not compromise: G-Sync allows you to reach the update of 360 Herz with a low delay and eliminate gaps at the same time.

According to NVIDIA studies, the update frequency of 360 Herz with a low delay improves the quality of “flichs” – sharp accurate shots. 4 % growth may be critical in e -sports.

As claims NVIDIA, GEFORCE RTX series video cards achieve 360 ​​frames per second in CS: GO, Rainbow Six Siege, Overwatch, Fortnite and other competitive disciplines.

NVIDIA understands that the advantages of 360 Herz cannot be fully conveyed in the text or video, so she arranged a live demonstration of the new monitor at the CES 2020 exhibition – partners and representatives of the press can evaluate the technology.

The cost of ROG SWIFT 360HZ will be announced later. The monitor must go on sale during this year.

January 5, 2020, the designer of the monsters from Silent Hill is working on a non -annexed game

January 6, 2020 Dota https://20betcasino.uk/mobile-app/ 2 fell to the indicators of January 2014 by players in Steam and lost the peak of CS: GO

The best comments

This is a standard in the cinema, because the film was very expensive and the film studios used the most economical option. Less than 24 FPS will already be physically difficult. In fact, it is high time to start shooting in 48 or 60 frames, it looks much more lively and immersion deeper, only such Framreite is very exposed to computer graphics, so so far it is not going to go on this level to this level

4K and 8K is 2160p and 4320p, respectively, and not these 4000p and 8000p, t.To. The height is usually indicated in the amount of pixels, not the width. Well, in one sentence to compare two widths and one height is just a bomb, of course)

Go to SES 2020 and see. People here most likely only learned about its existence and is unlikely to have already seen the differences.

This is actually a rather complicated process. Human vision is intermittent, and the brain simply finishes the picture if it does not keep up with the process, based on its templates and algorithms.
The eye does not work like a video camera, simply broadcasting a streaming image into the brain.

Those who make money that earn money is important every frame per second. Yes, the benefits above 120 Hz are no longer so noticeable in comparison, but any minimum advantage that will allow you to earn tens of thousands of dollars for several matches costs that.

This is a deep irony that you are trying to prove that a monitor with a greater frequency is useful because a person is able to distinguish between individual frames in smaller intervals. But the whole essence of the increase in the personnel frequency is that a person ceases to distinguish between individual frames. And since this effect is already reliably triggered on 24 frames per second, disputes about 30 and 60 FPS were substantial and interesting, 120 “Well, if you have a desire to change the iron and extra money your right”, but 300 dervor monitors are simply ridiculous. Stream sampling is achieved with the help of brain activity, and only the rams who are deliberately try to make out the personnel, such a cerebellar for their own money, is needed by such a monitor. Yes, even the manufacturer understands that it is ridiculous to promote their product from such an angle, and says there is a narrow group of people, among a narrow group of people who can come in handy, by the way, but you don’t want to join this group, they are so cool?

Nobody really kept repeating that.

Just if you change pictures less than 24 times a second, it will clearly be seen that in fact – this is a slide show.

Well, many, for some reason, they hear such a statement as "the human eye perceives only 24 frames per second".

Yes, no, the human brain (and we see the brain, no matter how stupid it sounds) too complicated to give this some kind of unit of measurement.

Live hack. Plant from 30 to 60 then again to 30 and, respectively, 60. Yes, for some time you will have a “broken” when returning to 30, but this is an adequate replacement of a constant purchase of more expensive monitors. Everything is simple – the brain is plastic. In fact, he reduces any number of personnel to the prepared to perceive the picture when minimizing his efforts, that is, their number is more excessive, it simply ignores, the deficiency is drawing up. The state of the transition between different monitors is accompanied by the use of the wrong template in the brain. Here, in general, two characteristics are distinguished, voltage vector and information intensity. Consider a smooth transition, a sharp increase in frequency can be stress, for more personnel. This leads to an increase in the intensity of information, the brain loves new information, such an increase in intensity pleasantly excites. When he understands that it is the same and excessive, he is rebuilt on another template and throws out successive personnel that differs little. Accordingly, the brain begins to understand, if everything goes on and so, I need less effort, and relaxes, subsequently the dormant point (the state to which the brain is ready at the beginning of work by the monitor) shifts in the direction of the voltage vector (in this case, relaxation). After the time when the brain approves a new perception template for him, it will be just OK (they will almost not even different). I think, by analogy, it is not difficult to imagine what is happening during the transition from a high frequency of personnel to a lower. And then it would seem, well, it is obvious that the advantages of high purity are undeniable. But all of the relish here is precisely in the sensation of the WAU effect when the transition from a low frequency to high. The actual unloading of the brain, even the costs of the process of restructuring the template itself reimburses only on a rather long period of time. The question of the possibility of grabbing some detail inaccessible at a lower frequency of personnel maximum rhetorical.

What is the problem? It is so difficult to check how many personnel/s perceive exactly "you"? He opened any video editor, created a 60 second video with a static picture, in which any desired frame value per second and somewhere randomly squeezed a frame parasite, so that it would be repeated once in any period in one second. I assure you you will notice a distortion of a static picture even at 1000 frames/s. Of course, you can’t see what exactly was on the parasitic frame, but the brain will process non-correspondence.

Treped eye is able to distinguish the frequency of shift change at a speed of the 2 hundred seconds. Stop raping the elderly format of film reel projectors of the beginning of the last century, it has nothing to do with the speed of perception of the eye of an ordinary person, adults, and write garbage, or this is a rather ridiculous attempt to xs irony

Just if you change pictures less than 24 times a second, it will clearly be seen that in fact – this is a slide show.

He has nothing to do with the speed of perception of the eye of an ordinary person, adults, and write garbage, or this is a rather ridiculous attempt to xs irony